Jump to content

Talk:Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Why does this article state "the appellees (supposedly representing the United States)"? Were the lawyers representing the appellees not employed by the DOJ? Or is there some important detail about who the lawyers filling this appeal were? (I feel that someone is trying to slip an opinion into this otherwise NPOV article.) -- llywrch

racism is bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its Effects


It raddicly changed the way congress looked at the comerce clause and rewerote the way we look at other people this act of the hotel was outrageous and dealt whith (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]



there is evidence that african american males had there ballsacks removed (cutt off) by white males in the Motel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 03:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's nuts. (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A mess of "needs sources" tags?


What's the motive behind defacing this entire article (header plus each individual section) with "needs external sources" maintenance tags? The original decision is sourced (findlaw) and contains most of the pertinent facts and allegations on which the case was decided. (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]



I want to source check and refimprove this and remove the template - it's embarrassing for the project to have one of the major cases of American Constitutional Law templated in this way - would there be objections to my using Bluebook citation throughout the page? I know Bluebook is demanding so I want to check with everyone here before I do this ... Seraphim System (talk) 02:42, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]